The Pirahã
November 10, 2008
Guardian article about a missionary who went to convert an Amazonian tribe to Christianity but instead, "learned to speak their unique language - and ended up rejecting his faith, losing his family and picking a fight with Noam Chomsky." I also heard him on Excess baggage on Saturday - highly recommended.
Comments
Thanks. Perfect distraction from translating!
Posted by Thatcher on November 11, 2008 12:34 PM
It seems a simplistic matter to explain either side of their disagreement. There are no ablosutes in the transition of life, from the beginning to now. That span is, as it was, in flux. Therefore, when one states that "all" are genetically directed to/from a single concept, there has to be room for, at the least, one abnormal gene, in all those millions of years. Why could the Piraha language structure, not be that exception?
Posted by Rym Rytr on November 12, 2008 9:43 PM
Thanks for the link, it is a great article. I am just a little bit skeptical about Everett "dismantling" Chomskyan theory, since he wasn't the first to discover a language that only has a present tense. Remember Sapir-Whorf hypothesis? It was actually based on the study of the Hopi language, which retains the same feature as Piraha. Only that later it was discovered that Hopi actually had references to the past and the future... Who knows, maybe the same will be later discovered for Piraha.
Posted by Monika on November 19, 2008 11:21 PM
Previous
My Cool Job
November 7, 2008
Next
5th anniversary
November 11, 2008

